Averaging Down Trading Strategy (How, Setup, Rules, Backtest, Returns) (2024)

If you trade stocks or any other financial market, you will often be confronted with that temptation: to buy more when the price goes lower. On the one part, you may have a cheaper entry price, but on the other hand, you may actually be doubling down on a losing trade. How do you approach the averaging down trading strategy?

Averaging down is a trading or investing method in which a stock owner buys more shares of a previously bought stock after the price has fallen. The main idea behind the average down technique is that it lowers the average purchase price, so when prices rise, it doesn’t take as much of an increase for the investor to start realizing a return on their investment.

In this post, we look at the averaging down trading strategy. We finish the article with a backtest.

Related reading:- A library of quantitative trading strategies

What does the averaging down trading strategy mean?

Averaging down is a trading or investing method in which a stock owner buys more shares of a previously bought stock after the price has fallen. The average price at which the trader bought the stock decreased due to this second purchase. It could be compared to averaging upward, where a trader buys more as the price rises.

Averaging down is so named because the average cost of the stock has been reduced. As a result, the point at which a trade can become profitable has been reduced.

The central concept behind the average down technique is that when prices rise, it doesn’t take as much of an increase for the investor to realize a return on their investment.

For instance, consider this: if an investor buys 100 shares of stock at $45 per share and the stock plummeted to $30 per share in price, the investor must wait for the stock to recover from a 33% reduction in price. However, based on the current price of $30, it will not take a 33% increase to return to break even. Now, a 50% increase in the stock is required for the position to return to the purchase price (from 30 to 45).

This mathematical truth can be addressed by averaging down. If the investor buys another 100 shares of stock at $30 each, the position will become profitable if the price rises to $37.50 (just a 25% increase). If the stock returns to its original price and continues to rise, the investor will begin to see about 16% profit by the time the stock reaches $45.

But it is not always that straightforward. The stock price can keep trading lower after further purchases. Nonetheless, as a part of a robust scale-in entry strategy, it can be a part of a smart investing plan. Some financial experts advise investors to use dollar-cost averaging (DCA) or average down with stocks or ETFs they plan to buy and hold.

• Dollar Cost Averaging vs. Lump Sum Investing Backtest

Is averaging down a good idea?

Well, it depends on the situation. There are two parts to whether or not to buy more shares of a stock that is declining in value. On the one hand, when prices are substantially lower, you can add more to a strong position. On the other hand, you can be adding to a losing position if the price continues to dip.

So, averaging down can be a smart move depending on the circ*mstances. If the stock price rises, you will have effectively increased your trade’s profitability by reducing your average entry price.

But if there is a high volume of selling against a company, you would be going against the trend. Adopting a contrarian approach and buying shares when others are selling can be profitable at times, but it can also mean that you’re missing out on the risks causing others to sell. If the stock’s value later declines, the loss from the initial trade has grown much more.

This is why traders disagree on the issue of whether averaging down is a good technique. While average down provides certain features of a strategy, it is not a comprehensive one.

Actually, averaging down is more of a mental attitude than a wise investing plan — it enables a trader to overcome various mental or emotional biases. In this case, it serves more as a safety net than as a wise course of action. However, if used as a part of an entry strategy, in which case you are averaging down while scaling in to an already planned position size, it can be a good idea.

• Scale-In Trading Strategy

Is averaging a good strategy in trading?

It depends on whether you are a short-term trader or a long-term investor:

If you plan to invest in a company for the long term, rather than just trade, you would have to know about the company. So, you may have a better sense of whether a drop in the stock price is temporary or a sign of trouble, based on the company’s past performance and current state.

In other words, averaging down may make sense if you truly believe in the company and want to increase your holdings. Buying more at a lower price makes sense if you intend to hold the stock for a long time. In this case, you use it as a part of an entry strategy. That is, you are averaging down while scaling into an already planned position size at lower prices so that your average purchase price becomes lower.

On the other hand, averaging down is probably not the best method for you if your only objective in the trade is to earn money and you have no actual interest in the underlying company other than how market, news, or economic events can affect its price. This is because you don’t know enough about the underlying business to tell whether a price decline is transient or indicative of a significant issue. For short-term trading, it’s common practice to manage risk and limit losses after losing a particular sum.

However, if you have a backtested strategy, it might make sense to average down. There is no clear answer, yes or no, whether it’s wise to average down; it depends on many circ*mstances.

• How to backtest a Trading Strategy

Is it better to average up or down in stocks?

It depends on your trading strategy and plan. Both averaging up and averaging down are used to scale into position, and scaling in is best suited for a long-term trading approach, even though short-term traders might attempt averaging up.

If you are a long-term trend follower, you can use either method, depending on what your analysis of the stock shows and your risk tolerance. A short-term trader can use averaging up to increase potential profit when their prediction is correct.

When averaging up, you are using your floating profit from the initial trade to enter a second position at a higher price, so the risk is reduced but not eliminated, as the price can still reverse and erode that floating profit and lead to a loss.

On the other hand, a long-term contrarian trader would favor average-down because the nature of their trade signal is that the signal gets juicier the farther away the price goes in the opposite direction.

Why should you not average down?

The issue with averaging down is that you may find it difficult to differentiate between a temporary price decline and the onset of a significant price drop. You don’t want to be in the way of a falling knife; it can hurt your trading account if you are a short-term trader.

Buying extra shares to reduce the average cost of ownership may not be a solid rationale to raise the proportion of your portfolio exposed to the price action of that one stock, even though there may be unrealized intrinsic value in buying at a lower price. While some may see averaging down is viewed as a cost-effective strategy for accumulating wealth by proponents, it could be a surefire recipe for failure.

For instance, a stock trading at $50 per share declining to $40 does not signal that it will turn from there and start rising. There is nothing that stops it from falling to $20 or even $0. You don’t just buy more shares because the price has fallen lower unless it is part of a well-planned entry strategy.

How do you average down to break even?

You don’t achieve breakeven by simply averaging down. Buying stocks at a lower price than you bought them initially does not automatically make you achieve breakeven. It only lowers your average purchase price. The stock would still need to rise for you to achieve breakeven. The only thing averaging down does is make the required rise needed to achieve breakeven lower.

For instance, assuming you bought 100 shares of a stock at $40 each. When the share price dropped to $20, you purchased an additional 100 shares. What you have done is reduce your average share price to $30. So, you are still $10 below the price you paid when you first purchased the stock.

To put it differently, even though your average purchase price decreased, you are still losing money on your initial purchase because a $20 decline in 100 shares equals a $2,000 loss. So, do not mistakenly believe that buying additional shares to average down the price will miraculously reduce your loss. You only recover the loss when the price moves from $20 to at least $30.

Averaging down formula

To calculate the breakeven price when averaging down, you can use this simple formula:

[(N₁ of shares x purchase price) + (N₂ of shares x second purchase price)] / (N₁ + N₂) of shares

Where:

• N₁ = initial number of shares purchased
• N₂ = number of shares at the second purchase

In other words, you divide the total amount spent buying the shares by the total number of shares bought on the occasions to arrive at the breakeven price. But this does not consider the trading fees (spreads and commissions).

Averaging down calculator

There are many stock trading tools online that you can use to track your average down strategy. They can calculate the average cost of your stocks when you purchase the same stock multiple times. They will give you the average cost for average down or average up.

Averaging down example

Let’s say you buy 100 shares of XYZ at $45.00 per share, and the stock plummets to $30.00 per share in price. If you buy another 100 shares of stock at $30 each, your average purchase price would be $37.50. If the stock returns to its original price of $45.00, you would have made about 16% profit.

Averaging down trading strategy backtest

Let’s do a backtest where we show you how averaging down can be profitable. This is how we backtest the averaging down strategy:

We chose to backtest SPY, the ETF that tracks S&P 500, because the index is very prone to mean reversion. We want to be aggressive when the index falls and sell on strength. We aim for high risk-adjusted returns. However, we want to average into our positions but sell 100% when we get a sell signal.

We use the RSI indicator to generate buy signals, and we split our equity into two positions: 50% each, thus making just two buys (or average down just once).

The first buy signal gets 50% of our equity, and the subsequent buy is allocated the remaining 50%. Thus, we split our equity into two parts. If we get a sell signal, we sell the whole position – no matter if we have 50 or 100% of our equity invested.

The exact code in plain English and Amibroker is only available for paying subscribers who have access to the code for all our best free trading strategies. Please have a look at the product:

The trading rules are simple:

Trading Rules

THIS SECTION IS FOR MEMBERS ONLY. _________________Click Here To Get Access For $1 Click Here To Get Access To Trading Rules

Let’s first backtest without averaging down. When the 5-day RSI crosses below 35, we allocate 100% of the equity. With no averaging down, we get the following equity curve:

The strategy performance metrics of our “naked” trading strategy are pretty good:

• The number of trades is 416
• The average gain per trade is 0.59%
• CAGR is 8.5% – slightly lower than buy and hold’s 9.6% (what is CAGR?)
• Time spent in the market is 21.7%
• The win rate is 74% (why you want a high win rate strategy)
• The profit factor is 2.0 (profit factor example)
• Max drawdown is 23% (how big max drawdown can you tolerate?)

Let’s go on to average down and see what happens. This is what we did:

We take our first position (50% of the equity) when the 5-day RSI crosses below 35, and we add the remaining 50% of equity when the 5-day RSI value drops more than 5 percentage points compared to the day before (for example, from 33 to 26).

The equity curve of the averaging down strategy backtest looks like this:

We end up with the same amount of capital when we average down, but the ride is smoother. All the trading metrics improve:

• The number of trades is 416 (Amibroker counts each scale-in trade as one)
• The average gain per trade is 1.06%
• CAGR is 8.3% – slightly lower than buy and hold’s 9.6%
• Time spent in the market is 14.5%
• The win rate is 83%
• The profit factor is 3.1
• Max drawdown is 17%

What is the best strategy – to average down or not?

It all depends. We believe that the best metric to look at is how much (or little) time you spend in the market compared to the returns. This is called risk-adjusted returns. The same return with less time spent in the market is preferable. Let’s look at this ratio:

• No average down: time in the market is 21.7%, and return is 8.5%, which equals 39.17% risk-adjusted return (8.5 divided by 0.217)
• With averaging down: time in the market is 14.5%, and return is 8.3%, which equals 57.2% risk-adjusted return (8.3 divided by 0.145)

We prefer the latter option (the average down strategy) because the capital is used more efficiently and could be employed elsewhere in the meantime. Another bonus is reduced drawdowns.

If you want to learn how to backtest and don’t fall prey to random anecdotal “evidence”, we recommend our backtesting course that explains the essentials of backtesting, the same principles that we use daily on this blog and in our trading.

Which markets are best to average down?

The average down backtest we did was performed on S&P 500. Can we expect an averaging down strategy to work well on other assets?

We believe that stocks are the best asset class to use the average down strategy because it’s prone to mean reversion. Most other markets are less mean revertive; thus, you might fail miserably by averaging down. The only way to reduce the risk of failure is to backtest and always have a margin of safety.