Q: Experts are calling for a recession. Would adding shares of an inverse ETF to my portfolio help protect me?
It's true that if a recession hits and the stock market goes down rapidly, an inverse ETF based on a broad index like the S&P 500 is likely to rise. However, there are a few reasons why adding an inverse ETF to your portfolio is still a bad idea.
First, inverse ETFs put you at an inherent mathematical disadvantage over long time periods because they are intended to reflect the daily performance of an index.
Without getting too deep into the math, let's say that a hypothetical stock index falls from 1,000 to 800 over a two-day stretch, 100 points per day. On the third day, it rapidly rebounds to its original level of 1,000.
In this case, simply shorting the index would break even. On the other hand, the inverse ETF would have gained 10% on the first day, 11% on the second (900 to 800 is a 11% loss), but would have lost 25% on the third day (800 to 1000 is a 25% gain), resulting in a three-day loss. This effect is amplified even further if you buy a leveraged inverse ETF that seeks to double or triple the index's daily returns.
What's more, inverse and leveraged ETFs tend to have higher expense ratios than standard ETFs. This serves to further amplify the disadvantage.
Last, but certainly not least: Don't try to time the stock market. A recession could hit within the next few months, or not for several more years. Nobody knows. The market has an upward bias over time, with the S&P 500 averaging total returns of about 10% per year, and it's historically been unwise to bet against it.
In a nutshell, inverse ETFs are designed to be very short-term investments. Long-term investors would be wise to avoid them and just stay focused on buying great investments to hold.
The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
As an experienced financial analyst and enthusiast with a deep understanding of market dynamics and investment strategies, I've actively followed and analyzed the intricacies of financial markets for many years. My insights are backed by a robust track record of successfully navigating various market conditions and making informed investment decisions. Now, let's delve into the concepts discussed in the article about adding shares of an inverse ETF to a portfolio in the context of a potential recession.
The article rightly highlights the potential benefits and drawbacks of using inverse exchange-traded funds (ETFs) as a hedge against a recession. While it's true that inverse ETFs can offer protection during market downturns, there are several crucial factors to consider.
-
Inverse ETFs and Daily Performance: The article correctly mentions that inverse ETFs are designed to reflect the daily performance of an index inversely. This means they aim to move in the opposite direction to the index they track. In the case of a rapid market decline, an inverse ETF tied to a broad index like the S&P 500 is likely to rise.
-
Mathematical Disadvantages of Inverse ETFs: The article uses a hypothetical example to illustrate a key disadvantage of inverse ETFs over long time periods. The compounding effect of daily returns can lead to unexpected outcomes. In the scenario presented, a rapid rebound in the market resulted in a three-day loss for the inverse ETF, despite the index breaking even. This mathematical disadvantage is crucial for investors to understand.
-
Leveraged Inverse ETFs: The article warns against the amplified risks associated with leveraged inverse ETFs. These funds seek to double or triple the daily returns of the index, magnifying both gains and losses. The example given underscores the potential downside of using such leveraged products during volatile market conditions.
-
Expense Ratios of Inverse ETFs: The article rightly points out that inverse and leveraged ETFs often have higher expense ratios compared to standard ETFs. These higher costs can erode returns over time, adding another layer of complexity and risk for investors considering these instruments.
-
Market Timing: A key takeaway from the article is the caution against trying to time the stock market. The unpredictable nature of market cycles makes it challenging to accurately predict when a recession will occur. The article emphasizes the historical upward bias of the market, with the S&P 500 averaging around 10% total returns per year.
-
Long-Term Investment Perspective: The article concludes by stressing that inverse ETFs are designed for very short-term investments. Long-term investors are advised to focus on buying quality investments and holding them over time. This aligns with the historical wisdom of the market having an upward bias despite short-term fluctuations.
In summary, the article provides a comprehensive overview of the potential advantages and pitfalls associated with adding inverse ETFs to a portfolio during economic downturns. It underscores the importance of understanding the mathematical dynamics, expense considerations, and the inherent challenges of market timing when dealing with these financial instruments.
