Active vs Passive Investing: How to Figure Out What's Best for You (2024)

In order to produce the podcast and keep content up free for you, I work with partners so this post may contain affiliate links. Please read myfull disclosurefor more info.

One of the first decisions you need to make with investing is figuring out what strategy is best for you. Learn how you can find a system that will help you reach your goals faster!

Whenever people start talking about investing, especially with retirement, a lot of opinions and thoughts get thrown around.

I get it. For many, retirement i the main reason they're investing and with so much on the line, they tend to get pretty emotional about certain things.

Having a healthy (and relatively objective) debate over the pros and cons can be a fantastic way to consider your options and figure out the best strategy for you.

However, it can be also an opportunity for people to argue.

Instead of talking about whetheror not something is effective or efficient, they get into emotions, opinions, and fall back to certain phrases they've heard, but not have checked.

Which is a recipe for disaster when you're investing.

Understanding Passive vs Active Investing

Active vs Passive Investing: How to Figure Out What's Best for You (1)

One big topic investors can feel stronglyabout is passive vs active investing.

If you're not familiar with it, I think you'll enjoy this week's interview.

I chatted with M1 Finance founder and CEO Brian Barnes about some of the biggest questions investors have, including:

  • the pros and cons of passive and active investing
  • minimizing rookie investor mistakes
  • finding tools and options that fit you and your goals

I think it'll help you figure out what works best for you and your goals.

You can watch the whole interview below or read an edited version of the highlights here.

Understanding Investing

Elle: I'm here with Brian Barnes the CEO of M1 Finance Thank you, Brian, for joining me.

Investing is a crucial component of building wealth and a lot of couples know that they should do that. But we live full lives.

Whether you have kids or not, you have your career, you have other family obligations your relationship – you're juggling so much and it seems like it's hard to get started and to maintain it.

I first heard about M1 Finance through Stacking Benjamins and it seemed like an option many couples could use. Would you mind giving a quick summary of it?

Brian Barnes: M1 Financeis an investing platform that automatically and intelligently invests your money into stocks, funds, and ETFs that you want.

So you come in and you can design a customized portfolio. Once you design that portfolio we like to say it is easy to manage just a savings account.

All you're doing is depositing (or withdrawing) money and it's enacting the plan that you want.

Elle: There's kind of two sides with investing right now. There is the higher fee and buying and selling of active managed investing where professionals trading for you (or you do it yourself).

And then there's passive investing where you choose an index fund or something similar and you kind of set it and forget it. You're not trying to time the market, just follow it.

Where do you see M1 Finance fitting in?

Brian Barnes: In some sense, we're a little bit in between those.

So let's take someone who says I have a criterion on where I want to invest my money – whether that's in certain ETF whether that's in certain individual stocks and companies.

I want to systematically contribute to it. So you might want to go to hundred dollars hundred dollars with my paycheck every two weeks.

And I want to make it really easy for me. I don't want to make investing my part-time day job.

I want to you know sort of be able to make a decision once. Here's how I want my money and I'm not having to remake that decision every single time I want to invest money.

Active vs Passive Investing: How to Figure Out What's Best for You (2)

Pros and Cons of Active and Passive Investing

Elle: Glad you mentioned investing perspectives.

With many couples, they come from two different perspectives. Like my husband is very hands off and I could do all the work for him for the investing. He's great. He just wants to focus on his career family you know. That's his style.

I like a little more hands on. I'm not a day trader; I have no interest in that. But I do like to keep tabs on finances.

But the conversation with couples is like how do we find the right strategy for us because there's a lot of strong feelings about passive investing versus active investing. And some people pretty hardcore on both sides of that.

I saw that you wrote an article on your site about that mindset and kind of giving the pros and cons to both.

Could you walk me through what those two sides are, how to weigh them, and find the right sweet spot for you?

Brian Barnes: Yeah, absolutely. I'll start with what I think is key.

I'm not saying is that personal component but if there was a one size fits all solution out there we wouldn't have this debate, everyone would do it.The issue is people differ.

They have different agendas and different risk tolerance they have different wants needs.

And so I think personal investing is finding out what works best for you and your partner.

You know I do agree that people pretty passionate about passive vs active investing. It's almost like a religious war. You know I think is a reasonable middle ground which M1 inhabits.

If you take the collection of the universe of every financial asset out there over time it's going to have one return.

And so you know if you just invest in that like on average everyone will have that return. The more you trade, the more you can buy and sell – those costs have taxes associated with that.

That cost is going to come out of the average. And so basically the more you transact the more you have costs; the lower the returns are going to be.

And so the passive crowd says the only thing that you should focus on is lowering costs as the only thing that you can ever control. And so you should lower the cost as much as possible.

And Vanguard became a giant saying cost matters. Cost is an important thing. Empirically you had a lot of evidence sayingthat managing costs can have an impact on the returns you see in the long run.

So that's the classic argument the active argument is you know costs do matter. It also matters what you in.

You wouldn't indiscriminately buy anything.

It's like buying a house – you want to know what you get. You would say,I want the commission to be as low as possible. You would also want to know how many rooms are there, what's the square footage, and where is it with the location.

So the active investor says it's possible to look at those things and spending time, resources, and energy to finding investments where you're getting more than what you're paying.

Over time the market will adjust the price will adjust to what the things actually worth and you'll make more money.

I think both sides have a ton of merits. I think it's again a personal decision.

Want to check out M1 Finance for yourself? See all it has to offer right here!

Thoughts on Passive vs Active Investing

Though we have most of our money invested in index funds, a portion of our portfolio is somewhat more actively managed. It fits our goals and styles.

Of course, like Brian, I believe you have to do the research and see for yourself.

If you want to learn more about investing, I have a whole episode on how diversified portfolio can be a huge win.

I'd love to hear from you – what's your investment strategy? How did you come up with it? Are you both on the same page or do you two have different takes?

This interview was originally released November 2017. It was updated October 2018.

Active vs Passive Investing: How to Figure Out What's Best for You (2024)

FAQs

Is it better to invest in active or passive funds? ›

Because active investing is generally more expensive (you need to pay research analysts and portfolio managers, as well as additional costs due to more frequent trading), many active managers fail to beat the index after accounting for expenses—consequently, passive investing has often outperformed active because of ...

Do active funds outperform passive funds? ›

However, when considering a 10-year scope, only 44% of active funds kept above the index and the active average return for 10 years only hit 56.5% while passive reached 60.5%. “While all active fund investors expect outperformance, it's not statistically possible for all managers to outperform,” Khalaf said.

Do you think you would want to invest in a passively managed fund or an actively managed one why? ›

Passive investment is less expensive, less complex, and often produces superior after-tax results over medium to long time horizons when compared to actively managed portfolios.

What do you see as the difference between passive and active investment strategies? ›

Passive investing is buying and holding investments with minimal portfolio turnover. Active investing is buying and selling investments based on their short-term performance, attempting to beat average market returns. Both have a place in the market, but each method appeals to different investors.

Why passive funds are better than active funds? ›

Risk: Active funds have a higher risk than passive funds, as they are subject to the fund manager's skill, judgment, and errors. Passive funds have a lower risk than active funds, as they eliminate the human factor and closely mirror the index, resulting in lower volatility and tracking error.

What's the best passive income to invest in? ›

It won't necessarily be easy, but these passive income streams are some of the best ways to get started.
  1. Dividend stocks. ...
  2. Real estate. ...
  3. Index funds. ...
  4. Bonds and bond funds. ...
  5. High-yield savings accounts and CDs. ...
  6. Peer-to-peer lending. ...
  7. Real estate investment trusts (REITs)
Feb 7, 2024

What are the disadvantages of passive investing? ›

Critics of passive investing say funds that simply track an index will always underperform the market when costs are taken into account. In contrast, active managers can potentially deliver market-beating returns by carefully choosing the stocks they hold.

How often do active funds beat the market? ›

Although it is very difficult, the market can be beaten. Every year, some managers boast better numbers than the market indices. A small fraction even manages to do so over a longer period. Over the horizon of the last 20 years, less than 10% of U.S. actively managed funds have beaten the market.

What are the disadvantages of active funds? ›

Cons
  • there's no guarantee an active fund will perform better than the index – in fact, research shows that relatively few active funds do.
  • it's not enough to just beat the index – active funds have to beat it by at least enough to cover their expenses, such as transaction fees.

What is a good asset allocation for a 30 year old? ›

Age-Based Asset Allocation

So if you're 30 years old you'd invest 80% of your portfolio in stocks (110 – 30 = 80). The rule of 110 is increasingly giving way to the rule of 120, however, as investors are living longer. With this rule, you use 120 in place of 110.

Do index funds beat actively managed funds? ›

Index funds tend to be low-cost, passive options that are well-suited for hands-off, long-term investors. Actively-managed mutual funds can be riskier and more expensive, but they have the potential for higher returns over time.

Why would someone choose an actively managed fund? ›

“Active” Advantages

Flexibility – because active managers, unlike passive ones, are not required to hold specific stocks or bonds. Hedging – the ability to use short sales, put options, and other strategies to insure against losses.

What is the key strategy of passive investing? ›

Passive investing is a long-term strategy for building wealth by buying securities that mirror stock market indexes and holding them long term. It can lower risk, because you're investing in a mix of asset classes and industries, not an individual stock.

What is the average expense ratio for passive index funds? ›

A reasonable expense ratio for an actively managed portfolio is about 0.5% to 0.75%, while an expense ratio greater than 1.5% is typically considered high these days. For passive funds, the average expense ratio is about 0.12%.

Does passive investing outperform the market? ›

Passive investing tends to perform better

Despite the fact that they put a lot of effort into it, the vast majority of of active fund managers underperform the market benchmark they're trying to beat. Even when actively managed funds do experience a period of outperformance, it doesn't tend to last long.

Should you invest in active funds? ›

When all goes well, active investing can deliver better performance over time. But when it doesn't, an active fund's performance can lag that of its benchmark index. Either way, you'll pay more for an active fund than for a passive fund.

Do active mutual funds outperform passive mutual funds? ›

Most active funds lagging

Active equity funds rely on managers' decisions, while passive funds attempt to track indices efficiently. As per SPIVA, five out of 10 large-cap funds underperformed the S&P BSE 100, while over 73% of mid- and smallcap schemes lagged the S&P BSE 400 MidSmallCap in 2023.

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Catherine Tremblay

Last Updated:

Views: 5720

Rating: 4.7 / 5 (47 voted)

Reviews: 86% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Catherine Tremblay

Birthday: 1999-09-23

Address: Suite 461 73643 Sherril Loaf, Dickinsonland, AZ 47941-2379

Phone: +2678139151039

Job: International Administration Supervisor

Hobby: Dowsing, Snowboarding, Rowing, Beekeeping, Calligraphy, Shooting, Air sports

Introduction: My name is Catherine Tremblay, I am a precious, perfect, tasty, enthusiastic, inexpensive, vast, kind person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.