623. Pleas—Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 (2024)

A defendant may plead guilty, not guilty, or, with the consent of the court, nolo contendere. If the defendant refuses to plead, or if a defendant corporation fails to appear, the court must enter a plea of not guilty. Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(a). In a criminal case, the plea of nolo contendere has the effect of a guilty plea. United States v. Norris, 281 U.S. 619 (1930). Under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11, a plea of nolo contendere shall be accepted by the court only with its consent and only after it gives due consideration to the views of the parties and the interest of the public in the effective administration of justice. The court does not have the authority to accept either a plea of guilty or a plea of nolo contendere until the court has first determined that the defendant has a requisite understanding and that the plea is voluntary, in accordance with Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure 11(c) and (d). See McCarthy v. United States, 394 U.S. 459 (1969); Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 (1969). The requirement in Rule 11(f) that the court not enter a judgment upon a guilty plea without determining that there is a factual basis for the plea, does not extend to criminal forfeiture charged under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 7 since such forfeiture is part of the sentence, not the offense. See Libretti v. United States, 116 S. Ct. 356 (1995).

Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(c) requires that, before accepting a plea of guilty or nolo contendere, the court must address the defendant personally in open court and inform him/her of, and determine that he/she understands, the following: (1) the nature of the charge to which the plea is offered, the mandatory minimum penalty provided by law, if any, and the maximum possible penalty provided by law, including the effect of any special parole or supervised release term, the fact that the court is required to consider any applicable sentencing guidelines, and that the court may also order restitution to any victim of the offense; (2) if the defendant is not represented by an attorney, that he/she has the right to be represented by an attorney at every stage of the proceeding against him/her and, if necessary, one will be appointed to represent him/her; (3) that he/she has the right to plead not guilty or to persist in that plea if it has already been made, and that he/she has the right to be tried by a jury and at that trial has the right to the assistance of counsel, the right to confront and cross-examine witnesses against him/her, and the right not to be compelled to incriminate himself/herself; (4) that if his/her plea of guilty or nolo contendere is accepted by the court there will not be a further trial of any kind, so that by pleading guilty or nolo contendere he/she waives the right to a trial; and (5) that if the court intends to question the defendant under oath, on the record, and in the presence of counsel about the offense to which he/she has pleaded, that his/her answers may later be used against him/her in a prosecution for perjury or false statement. A court's failure to comply will not, however, necessarily entitle a defendant to relief. See United States v. Timmreck, 441 U.S. 780 (1979). It is not necessary that every conceivable consequence of sentencing be communicated to the defendant. See Bunker v. Wise, 550 F.2d 1155 (8th Cir.1977).

Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(d) requires that the court not accept a plea of guilty or nolo contendere without first, by addressing the defendant personally in open court, determining that the plea is voluntary and not the result of force or threats or of promises apart from a plea agreement. The Court shall also inquire whether the defendant's willingness to plead guilty or nolo contendere results from prior discussions between the attorney for the government and the defendant or his/her attorney.

[cited in JM9-16.001]

I've spent years immersed in criminal law, diving into the intricacies of legal procedures, including plea bargaining and the nuances of different plea options. When discussing the concepts within the provided article, it's essential to understand the options available to defendants in criminal cases: pleading guilty, not guilty, or nolo contendere (no contest).

Let's break down the key concepts:

  1. Plea Options:

    • Guilty: Admitting responsibility for the charged offense.
    • Not Guilty: Denying the alleged offense and requiring the prosecution to prove guilt.
    • Nolo Contendere: A plea where the defendant doesn't admit guilt but accepts punishment. It's treated as a guilty plea but may offer some advantages in civil cases arising from the same incident.
  2. Court Actions Regarding Pleas:

    • Acceptance of Pleas: Courts can accept guilty or nolo contendere pleas only with consent and after ensuring the defendant understands the charges and voluntarily agrees.
    • Judge's Responsibilities: Before accepting any plea, the judge must personally address the defendant, ensuring comprehension of the charges, consequences, and rights waived by pleading guilty or nolo contendere.
  3. Rule of Criminal Procedure 11:

    • Requirements: This rule mandates that the court ensure the defendant comprehends the charges, rights, and potential penalties before accepting any plea.
    • Voluntary Plea: The court must verify that the plea is voluntary, not due to coercion or false promises.
  4. Consequences of Plea:

    • Waiver of Rights: By entering a guilty or nolo contendere plea, the defendant waives the right to trial and associated protections.
    • Perjury Risk: If the defendant provides false information during the plea process under oath, it can be used against them in a perjury prosecution.
  5. Court Compliance and Entitlement to Relief:

    • Court's Duty: Failure by the court to comply with the requirements of Rule 11 doesn't automatically grant relief to the defendant.
    • Communicating Consequences: While essential elements must be communicated, not every potential consequence of sentencing needs explicit mention.
  6. Voluntary Nature of the Plea:

    • Determining Voluntariness: The court must ascertain that the plea is not a result of threats, coercion, or promises outside of a plea agreement. The defendant's attorney involvement is also examined.

Understanding these concepts helps ensure fair and informed legal proceedings. The nuances of plea bargaining and the specific requirements laid out in the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure underscore the importance of due process in criminal cases.

623. Pleas—Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 (2024)
Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Delena Feil

Last Updated:

Views: 5949

Rating: 4.4 / 5 (65 voted)

Reviews: 80% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Delena Feil

Birthday: 1998-08-29

Address: 747 Lubowitz Run, Sidmouth, HI 90646-5543

Phone: +99513241752844

Job: Design Supervisor

Hobby: Digital arts, Lacemaking, Air sports, Running, Scouting, Shooting, Puzzles

Introduction: My name is Delena Feil, I am a clean, splendid, calm, fancy, jolly, bright, faithful person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.