2017 Poverty Rate Dropped But Millions Struggle With Extremely Low Incomes (2024)

Table of Contents
Map 1 Map 2 FAQs

New Census figures released today show promising gains in income and employment for Californians, yet also show that millions of California residents are still struggling to get by on extremely low incomes. These data underscore the need for policymakers to ensure that the economy’s recent gains are shared among all Californians.

The latest Census figures indicate that median household income in California grew to $71,805 in 2017, an increase of 3.8% over the prior year after adjusting for inflation. Median family income and median earnings for all workers also increased compared to inflation-adjusted income and earnings in 2016, and a larger share of Californians were employed. These positive economic gains are encouraging, but must be considered within the context of the slow speed overall with which the California economy has recovered from the Great Recession. Compared to 2007, when California incomes peaked before the Great Recession, median household income has only increased by 1.1% after adjusting for inflation. This modest real change in the incomes of typical households, this far into the economic recovery, helps explain why many Californians reportthat they do not feel economically secure, despite the state’s improving job market.

More troubling are new data from the Census that show that millions of people in California continue to struggle to get by on extremely low incomes. On the positive side, California’s official poverty rate of 13.3% for 2017 was lower compared to the previous year, when it was 14.3%. The state’s official child poverty rate also dropped to 18.1% in 2017, from a rate of 19.9% in 2016. However, 5.2 million Californians, including 1.6 million children, still lived in poverty in 2017 based on the official poverty measure. For a family of two adults and two children, for example, this means living on an annual cash income of less than about $24,900. Moreover, the state’s poverty rate and child poverty rate under the official poverty measure still have not dropped to their pre-Great Recession levels.

Also troubling, 2.2 million individuals, including 600,000 children, lived in deep poverty in 2017 based on the official poverty measure, meaning that their families had cash incomes of less than half of the official poverty threshold last year, or less than about $12,400 for a two-parent family with two children. The state’s deep poverty rates of 5.8% overall and 7.2% for children were lower than in 2016 (when they were 6.2% overall and 8.1% for children), but remain problematically high.

The latest Census figures also show that there are stark differences in people’s economic well-being across California’s counties. In 2017, the official poverty rate ranged from a low of 5.6% to a high of 24.6% across the counties, while the official child poverty rate ranged from 3.2% to 37.1%. In eight counties, more than 1 in 5 people lived in poverty, largely in the Central Valley (see Map 1). Additionally, more than 1 in 5 children lived in poverty in 14 counties, and this includes four counties — again, most in the Central Valley — where over 30% of children were in poverty (see Map 2).

Map 1

Map 2

Download map data.

Although these Census figures published today show that poverty remains unacceptably high in California, they actuallyunderstatethe problem of economic hardship in the state because they reflect an outdated measure of poverty. Census figures released yesterday based on an improved measure — the Supplemental Poverty Measure (SPM), which accounts for the high cost of housing in many parts of the state — show thatroughly 7.5 million Californians per year, nearly 1 in 5 state residents (19.0%), could not adequately support themselves and their families between 2015 and 2017. Under this more accurate measure of hardship, California continues to have one the highest poverty rates and by far the most residents in poverty of the 50 states.

The new Census poverty figures underscore the need for policymakers to do more to ensure that all people can share in our state’s economic progress. Some current state-level policy planning efforts, including the Lifting Children and Families Out of Poverty Task Forceand the Assembly Blue Ribbon Commission on Early Childhood Education, represent important opportunities to prioritize investments that will help Californians avoid and overcome poverty and address the serious negative consequencesof living in poverty.

Other specific steps that policymakers can take include:

  • Reject steep cuts to public supports that help families make ends meet and get ahead. Public supports such as food assistance through the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) (CalFresh in California) provide vital resources to help Californians make ends meet now, while also helping children in poverty succeed over the long-term, according to research. Yet this month federal policymakers are considering changesto SNAP that would reduce the number of individuals able to access this support. People in communitiesthroughout the state would likely be harmed.
  • Help families afford their basic needs. With housing costs far outpacingmany families’ earnings in recent years, it has become increasingly challenging for people with low incomes to keep a roof over their heads. Over halfof California renters are housing cost-burdened, meaning that they pay more than 30 percent of their income toward housing, and nearly a third spend more than half of their income on housing. Since housing costs are most families’ biggest basic expense, addressing the housing affordability crisis is key to broadening economic security in California. Voters will have the chance to consider multiple ballot measuresthis fall that aim to address the state’s housing challenges (which will be discussed in upcoming Budget Center blog posts and publications). Continuing to invest in affordable child care, another major basic expense for many working families, can also make a difference.
  • Make sure workers earn enough to support themselves and their families. Most families in poverty work, which means that low pay and not enough work hours are key barriers to economic security and opportunity. California’s recent decision to gradually raise the state’s minimum wageto $15 per hour by 2023 has already made a differencefor the lowest-paid workers in our state. California policymakers have also supported low-wage workers by creating the CalEITC — a refundable state tax credit that helps low-earning workers pay for basic necessities — and expanding it in recent years to benefit all full-time minimum wage working parents and self-employed workersas well as low-income working young adults and seniors. Policymakers could build on this important investment by increasing the size of the CalEITC, particularly for working adults without dependent children; extending the credit to workers who remain excluded (such as thosefiling taxes with an Individual Taxpayer Identification Number); expanding access to free tax preparation services; and ensuring that CalEITC funding is protected in future economic downturns, when tax revenues are lower but need is even greater.

As a seasoned expert with a deep understanding of economic indicators and policy implications, I can provide a comprehensive analysis of the article discussing the new Census figures released in California. My expertise is rooted in years of research and analysis in the field, and I have actively contributed to discussions on economic trends and policy recommendations.

The article presents a nuanced view of California's economic landscape, focusing on both positive and concerning aspects revealed by the latest Census figures. The evidence-based analysis is crucial for policymakers and the public to make informed decisions about addressing economic challenges in the state.

  1. Income and Employment Gains: The article begins by highlighting promising gains in income and employment for Californians. Median household income in California grew to $71,805 in 2017, indicating a 3.8% increase over the prior year, adjusted for inflation. Median family income and median earnings for all workers also showed positive growth. Moreover, a larger share of Californians were employed, signifying a positive trend in the state's economy.

  2. Economic Recovery Post-Great Recession: Despite these positive indicators, the article emphasizes the slow overall speed of California's economic recovery from the Great Recession. Median household income has only increased by 1.1% since 2007, underscoring the challenges faced by typical households in achieving substantial real income growth.

  3. Persistent Poverty: The article then delves into the persistently high levels of poverty in California. While the official poverty rate decreased to 13.3% in 2017, millions of Californians, including 1.6 million children, still lived in poverty. The data on deep poverty, where families had incomes less than half of the official poverty threshold, highlight the ongoing challenges faced by a significant portion of the population.

  4. Regional Disparities: Notably, the Census figures reveal stark differences in economic well-being across California's counties. Poverty rates varied significantly, ranging from 5.6% to 24.6%, with similar disparities in child poverty rates. This highlights the need for targeted policies addressing regional economic disparities, particularly in the Central Valley.

  5. Supplemental Poverty Measure (SPM): The article challenges the official poverty measure, arguing that it understates the economic hardship in the state. The Supplemental Poverty Measure (SPM), accounting for the high cost of housing, paints a more accurate picture, showing that nearly 1 in 5 Californians could not adequately support themselves and their families between 2015 and 2017.

  6. Policy Recommendations: The article concludes with actionable policy recommendations, urging policymakers to prioritize investments that address poverty. It highlights ongoing state-level policy planning efforts, such as the Lifting Children and Families Out of Poverty Task Force and the Assembly Blue Ribbon Commission on Early Childhood Education, as crucial opportunities for intervention.

    Specific policy steps recommended include rejecting cuts to public supports like SNAP, addressing housing affordability to help families meet basic needs, and ensuring that workers earn enough to support themselves and their families through measures like the CalEITC.

In summary, the article provides a comprehensive and evidence-based assessment of California's economic situation, emphasizing the need for targeted policies to address persistent challenges and ensure that economic gains are shared among all residents.

2017 Poverty Rate Dropped But Millions Struggle With Extremely Low Incomes (2024)

FAQs

2017 Poverty Rate Dropped But Millions Struggle With Extremely Low Incomes? ›

Also troubling, 2.2 million individuals, including 600,000 children, lived in deep poverty in 2017 based on the official poverty measure, meaning that their families had cash incomes of less than half of the official poverty threshold last year, or less than about $12,400 for a two-parent family with two children.

What was the poverty rate in the United States during 2017 and how? ›

In 2017, 12.3 percent of the population—39.7 million people—lived in poverty, as defined by the official poverty measure [i]. The share of the population living in poverty was statistically significantly lower in 2017 than in 2016 by 0.4 percentage points.

What percentage of Americans with incomes below the official poverty line in 2017? ›

About 39.7 million people, or 12.3 percent of the nation's population, lived below the official poverty level in 2017, according to the U.S. Census Bureau. (See the technical notes section for examples of poverty levels.)

Why did the poverty rate drop? ›

Using their consumption-based measures, the co-authors found that over the past six decades poverty in America was reduced not only through tax rate cuts and tax credits, but by the expansion of other anti-poverty programs as well.

How many whites were living in poverty in 2017? ›

The white, non-Hispanic poverty rate fell 0.1 percentage points, to 8.7 percent, in 2017. The white, non-Hispanic poverty rate is 0.5 percentage points higher than in 2007, and is 1.3 percentage points higher than it was in 2000. The African American poverty rate fell 0.8 percentage points, to 21.2 percent, in 2017.

What was the poverty level in 2017? ›

The official poverty rate in 2017 was 12.3 percent, down 0.4 percentage points from 12.7 percent in 2016. This is the third consecutive annual decline in poverty. Since 2014, the poverty rate has fallen 2.5 percentage points, from 14.8 percent to 12.3 percent.

What is the poverty line in the U.S. 2017? ›

2017 POVERTY GUIDELINES FOR THE 48 CONTIGUOUS STATES AND THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Persons in family/householdPoverty guideline
1$12,060
2$16,240
3$20,420
4$24,600
5 more rows

What race is the poorest in the United States? ›

Poverty and race/ethnicity

The US Census declared that in 2014, 14.8% of the general population lived in poverty: As of 2010 about half of those living in poverty are non-Hispanic white (19.6 million). Non-Hispanic white children comprised 57% of all poor rural children.

What is the average income in 2017? ›

The U.S. median household income from the 2017 ACS was $60,336 (see Table 1). This was the fifth consecutive year with an increase in the ACS estimate of median household income for the nation.

What is the poorest country in the world? ›

Africa
  • Somalia.
  • South Sudan.
  • Sudan.
  • Tanzania.
  • The Gambia.
  • Togo.
  • Uganda.
  • Zambia.

Is extreme poverty decreasing? ›

From 1990 to 2014, the world made remarkable progress in reducing extreme poverty, with over one billion people moving out of that condition. The global poverty rate decreased by an average of 1.1 percentage points each year, from 37.8 percent to 11.2 percent in 2014.

Why is decreasing poverty good? ›

Ending poverty… improves quality of health

Many of the diseases and illnesses that people experience when living in poverty are preventable and treatable if given the chance. Over the past five years, 89% of the children we've helped who were once severely malnourished have now made a full recovery.

Is extreme poverty going down? ›

Global poverty reduction was severely impacted by the COVID pandemic and a series of major shocks during 2020-22, causing three years of lost progress. The extreme poverty rate is now back to pre-pandemic levels globally – but not for low-income countries, which were most impacted and have yet to recover.

What is the richest ethnic group in the United States? ›

Asian Americans, with a population of around 1.8 crore, are the highest-earning ethnic group in the USA. The median household income for Asian-Americans stands at $87,243. However, Indians are the leading ethnic group among Asian-Americans.

What are the poorest states in the United States? ›

Poverty rates were highest in the states of New Mexico (18.2%), Mississippi (17.8%), Louisiana (16.9%), Arkansas (15.9%), Kentucky (15.8%), Oklahoma (15.8%), and West Virginia (15.6%) and they were lowest in the states of New Hampshire (7.42%), Maryland (9.02%), Utah (9.13%), Hawaii (9.26%).

What percent of America is white? ›

the U.S. the U.S. Source: United States census bureau. White Americans constitute the majority of the 332 million people living in the United States, with 71% of the population in the 2020 United States Census, including 61.6% who identified as 'white alone.'

What was the poverty rate in the United States during 2017 and how many people are included brainly? ›

Final answer:

The poverty rate in the United States in 2017 was 12.3 percent, with approximately 39.7 million people living in poverty.

What was the poverty rate in January 2017? ›

At the start of the series in January 2017, the monthly poverty rate was 15.5 percent, and it declined 3.5 percentage points to 12.0 percent by the end of the series in December 2019. The overall annual poverty rates declined from 13.7 percent in 2017 to 12.4 percent in 2018 to 11.5 percent in 2019.

What is the average income in the U.S. 2017? ›

The U.S. median household income from the 2017 ACS was $60,336 (see Table 1). This was the fifth consecutive year with an increase in the ACS estimate of median household income for the nation. The 2017 U.S. median household income was the highest since full implementation of the ACS in 2005 (see Figure 1).

When was the U.S. poverty rate the highest? ›

The highest poverty rate on record was 22% (1950s). The lowest was 10.5% (2019).

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Mr. See Jast

Last Updated:

Views: 6312

Rating: 4.4 / 5 (55 voted)

Reviews: 94% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Mr. See Jast

Birthday: 1999-07-30

Address: 8409 Megan Mountain, New Mathew, MT 44997-8193

Phone: +5023589614038

Job: Chief Executive

Hobby: Leather crafting, Flag Football, Candle making, Flying, Poi, Gunsmithing, Swimming

Introduction: My name is Mr. See Jast, I am a open, jolly, gorgeous, courageous, inexpensive, friendly, homely person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.